Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 171
In response to
"
Ignoring the POTUS aspect for a moment, how does attorney/client privilege work when an attorney records something that the government legally takes? -- nm
"
by
David
I'm guessing it's fruit from the poisoned tree and therefore inadmissible? -- nm
Posted by
LMS (aka RufusS)
Jul 20 '18, 09:36
(No message)
Responses:
But isn't that the entire point of getting a warrant to search someone's home? The police are seeking incriminating evidence. -- nm
-
David
Jul 20, 09:38
3
My guess is that if the recording contains evidence of a crime that both the client and lawyer are involved it, it won't be considered privileged
-
TWuG
Jul 20, 09:42
I need to see if there's an episode of The Good Wife that covers this! -- nm
-
LMS
Jul 20, 09:40
1
😜 -- nm
-
David
Jul 20, 09:42
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.