ST Alpha - "Why would Cohen have "secretly" recorded it? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 171

In response to "Basically, yes. Conspiring with a client to commit a crime is not privileged. But a client seeking advice for something they did, is. -- nm" by pmb

Why would Cohen have "secretly" recorded it? -- nm

Posted by prayformojo (aka mayhem) Jul 20 '18, 09:47

(No message)

Responses:

To cover his own ass if his client later tries to claim they didn’t say something that they had. -- nm - znufrii Jul 20, 09:48 6
- Gotcha. Thanks. -- nm - prayformojo Jul 20, 09:51 3
  - It’s an important safeguard when your client is a pathological liar, among other things. -- nm - znufrii Jul 20, 09:57 2
    - and it's legal to do that? -- nm - prayformojo Jul 20, 10:01 1
      - Eh? -- nm - znufrii Jul 20, 10:08
- Yep. Don can't say Cohen acted on his own if he's on tape telling Cohen to act. -- nm - TWuG Jul 20, 09:50 1
  - And then there's just the possibility he wanted leverage over Trump in case he needed it in the future. -- nm - pmb Jul 20, 09:53

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.