Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 152
Without spoiling, re: American Idol (imagine it's Tuesday): Adam can be successful without a win. Chris needs a win. -- nm
Posted by
Mop (236 lbs) (aka rburriel)
May 21 '09, 09:53
(No message)
Responses:
I think it's been proven that the post-Idol success of a contestant has little to do with whether they win. -- nm
-
con_carne
May 21, 09:55
6
The two most successful were winners. -- nm
-
loosilu
May 21, 09:56
5
i really don't know if i'd say that's true. i think Hudson and Aiken were as successful as Clarkson and Underwood. -- nm
-
Andie
May 21, 10:00
2
Not even close. -- nm
-
Ender
May 21, 10:34
Hudson potentially with the Oscar (but only that)...Aiken is a ways back.
-
Will Hunting
May 21, 10:18
The flipside of the coin reminds us of Taylor and Ruben. -- nm
-
Mop (236 lbs)
May 21, 09:57
1
I think it also helps that the two winners were Top 40 crossovers. Taylor is blues(y) and Ruben R&B.
-
JaxSean
May 21, 10:00
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.