ST Alpha - "Only if it isn’t true. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "the definition of stock manipulation -- nm" by Beaker

Only if it isn’t true. -- nm

Posted by znufrii Aug 9 '18, 19:07

(No message)

Responses:

still feels like the smart first place to mention it is in an SEC filing. or anywhere but twitter really. even the blog post is lacking any real info. -- nm - mafic Aug 9, 19:10 3
- I’m not saying it wasn’t dumb, just that it likely wasn’t illegal manipulation, if it’s true, as far as I understand it. -- nm - znufrii Aug 9, 19:23 2
  - my cynical conspiracy is he has no concrete plans, did it to hurt the shorts, and has done just enough ass-covering to make it legal. -- nm - mafic Aug 9, 19:26 1
    - Except all this does is encourage the shorts, really, because now there’s clear downside risk with the possibility a deal doesn’t happen. -- (edited) - znufrii Aug 9, 19:31

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.