Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 14:43
2: Dec 11, 11:29
3: Dec 11, 07:59
4: Dec 10, 18:15
5: Dec 10, 12:28
6: Dec 10, 09:30
7: Dec 10, 05:59
8: Dec 9, 17:07
9: Dec 9, 13:47
10: Dec 9, 10:33
11: Dec 9, 07:33
12: Dec 8, 17:50
13: Dec 8, 10:32
14: Dec 8, 06:23
15: Dec 7, 16:52
16: Dec 7, 07:17
17: Dec 6, 14:40
18: Dec 6, 10:07
19: Dec 6, 07:32
20: Dec 5, 19:48
Posts: 158
In response to
"
Only if it isn’t true. -- nm
"
by
znufrii
still feels like the smart first place to mention it is in an SEC filing. or anywhere but twitter really. even the blog post is lacking any real info. -- nm
Posted by
mafic
Aug 9 '18, 19:10
(No message)
Responses:
I’m not saying it wasn’t dumb, just that it likely wasn’t illegal manipulation, if it’s true, as far as I understand it. -- nm
-
znufrii
Aug 9, 19:23
2
my cynical conspiracy is he has no concrete plans, did it to hurt the shorts, and has done just enough ass-covering to make it legal. -- nm
-
mafic
Aug 9, 19:26
1
Except all this does is encourage the shorts, really, because now there’s clear downside risk with the possibility a deal doesn’t happen. -- (edited)
-
znufrii
Aug 9, 19:31
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.