ST Alpha - "RB's are slightly more valuable than the WR's due to position scarcity -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 156

In response to "Are there any benefits to a WR over a RB or vice versa? -- nm" by crash davis

RB's are slightly more valuable than the WR's due to position scarcity -- nm

Posted by Strongbad (aka Rambler14) Aug 20 '18, 11:21

(No message)

Responses:

I was more aiming for in BF we now only start one RB and more WRs so position scarcity isn't as big a deal. -- nm - crash davis Aug 20, 11:22 4
- This is not BF. Assume 1 RB, 1 WR and 3 FLEX. -- nm - Strongbad Aug 20, 11:23 3
  - Julio is aging, Barkley hasn't proven anything yet, and Gordon is a flake. That is bottom of my list -- nm - crash davis Aug 20, 11:27 2
    - I'm a Barkley guy. - Strongbad Aug 20, 11:29 1
      - I've been burned so often on rookie hype that I hate rookies -- nm - crash davis Aug 20, 11:31
(and obv WR you can usually depend on a longer career) -- nm - Strongbad Aug 20, 11:21

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.