Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 156
In response to
"
Stupid question -- best wording to state an improvement in efficiency if my fix took required job hours from 40 to 4.
"
by
Will Hunting, Ruler Supreme of Blood Feud
it'll sound sarcastic, but that's a 1000% increase in efficiency. -- nm
Posted by
Reagen
Aug 26 '18, 19:37
(No message)
Responses:
I'd only call it that if it were going the other way. use the initial number as a base and call it 90%. -- nm
-
mafic
Aug 26, 19:40
1
never mind. I see my mistake now. 90% faster, 1000% more efficient is right. -- nm
-
mafic
Aug 26, 19:41
Is sarcastic quite the right word for that? -- nm
-
Beryllium
Aug 26, 19:39
Yeah, that's why I wouldn't use that wording. It sounds exaggerated. -- nm
-
David
Aug 26, 19:38
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.