Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 12, 13:06
2: Dec 12, 08:55
3: Dec 11, 23:59
4: Dec 11, 14:43
5: Dec 11, 11:29
6: Dec 11, 07:59
7: Dec 10, 18:15
8: Dec 10, 12:28
9: Dec 10, 09:30
10: Dec 10, 05:59
11: Dec 9, 17:07
12: Dec 9, 13:47
13: Dec 9, 10:33
14: Dec 9, 07:33
15: Dec 8, 17:50
16: Dec 8, 10:32
17: Dec 8, 06:23
18: Dec 7, 16:52
19: Dec 7, 07:17
20: Dec 6, 14:40
Posts: 154
In response to
"
Is Federal RFRA bigoted? -- nm
"
by
Strongbad
Was it passed to allow discrimination against individuals based on supposedly religious grounds? -- (edited)
Posted by
znufrii, promoted (aka znufrii)
Aug 29 '18, 06:53
No.
The false equivalence is as transparent here as it is absurd.
Responses:
You and TWuG can discuss and let me know what you decide.
-
Strongbad
Aug 29, 07:20
9
[deleted]
not picking a side but the non-/bigotteness of something can change with the passage of time for several reasons
-
Reagen
Aug 29, 07:25
A cursory overview of the history of the act on Wikipedia tells me that it was passed to protect native religious practices
-
znufrii, promoted
Aug 29, 07:25
6
So the legislation wasn't bigoted when passed but the Court interpretation made it that way? -- nm
-
Strongbad
Aug 29, 07:48
2
[deleted]
1
Cool. Thanks. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Aug 29, 07:59
[deleted]
2
Victim of the overriding "Law of Unintended Consequences". -- nm
-
pmb
Aug 29, 07:36
1
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
