ST Alpha - "sure. that needs to happen. a LOT needs to happen though. and everyone wants to pass it on to someone else to deal with. we have to start taking " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 168

In response to "Yes, but it’s like budgeting: when you need to make room for something, you don’t belt-tighten on thumbtacks, you reduce travel on the corporate jets. -- nm" by Beryllium

sure. that needs to happen. a LOT needs to happen though. and everyone wants to pass it on to someone else to deal with. we have to start taking

Posted by Andie Oct 10 '18, 07:30

ownership at ALL levels.

either that or the kids are screwed.

Responses:

“100 corporations are responsible for 71% of emissions” is the slightly-misleading headline I’ve seen the past couple weeks. Not sure if McDonalds - Beryllium Oct 10, 07:35 7
- I assume McDonalds would be because the environmental impact of its supply chain is enormous. -- nm - Roger More Oct 10, 07:37 6
  - The list of 100 corporations is pretty much all Coal and oil companies. -- nm - Ender Oct 10, 07:43 1
    - Thanks -- nm - Roger More Oct 10, 07:56
  - But would that even count drivethru emissions, or just cow farts? -- nm - Beryllium Oct 10, 07:40 3
    - I wouldn’t expect it to include drive thru emissions, but companies like McDonalds can still make decisions that would reduce drive thru emissions. - Roger More Oct 10, 07:46 1
      - McDonalds has enabled app-based ordering which can speed things up. I’m not sure if their two-lane drivethrus reduce emissions. -- nm - Beryllium Oct 10, 07:52
    - (I’d have to read the actual study, but I’m guessing vehicular emissions got attributed to Shell et al) -- nm - Beryllium Oct 10, 07:41

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.