Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 154
In response to
"
That's a ding on the editor more than the director. -- nm
"
by
Reagen
There were a few cuts that were somehwta mindboggling, likely just changing takes.
Posted by
Marlowe
Oct 12 '18, 06:51
Which I think goes to how it was shot.
Responses:
maybe the fast run through of 42 days of shooting is showing? I don't know. Overall its a good movie. -- nm
-
Epiphany
Oct 12, 06:54
2
I think it was a tad ambitious for the film to be shot the way it was, considering it's a firts time effort.
-
Marlowe
Oct 12, 06:56
1
I have a theory on your IM not sure if its spoilish or not
-
Epiphany
Oct 12, 07:06
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.