ST Alpha - "Monsanto lost their appeal to a case brought by a man that claims that RoundUp caused his cancer. -- (link)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 171

Monsanto lost their appeal to a case brought by a man that claims that RoundUp caused his cancer. -- (link)

Posted by Krusty (aka Krustylu) Oct 23 '18, 06:24

(No message)

After what I read last week it sounded like the judge would either overturn the verdict or lower the award significantly. She lowered it but not all that much. (www.theguardian.com)

Responses:

We really need to stop letting lay people resolve questions of science in court. -- nm - TWuG Oct 23, 06:27 11
- We need to hold companies accountable when they produce things that cause us to die prematurely. -- nm* - Krusty Oct 23, 06:29 10
  - The science says glyphosate, in the quantities people are exposed to, is not a cancer risk -- (link) - TWuG Oct 23, 06:32 9
    - "Studies on cancer rates in people have provided conflicting results on whether the use of glyphosate containing products is associated with cancer. -- (edited) - Krusty Oct 23, 06:37 5
      - We need more testing and research but things don't look all that good. -- (link) - Krusty Oct 23, 06:40 4
        
        That article discusses things other than cancer (which was what the court case focused on) and agrees that glyphosate is nontoxic, but that in - TWuG Oct 23, 06:51 3
        
        I posted it to show that science hasn't decided anything on this and that it needs more testing and research. The previous post talks about cancer. -- nm - Krusty Oct 23, 06:53 2
        
        Which is why a court decision makes no sense. "Conflicted" science doesn't become unconflicted because of a court decision, but that decision - TWuG Oct 23, 07:00 1
        
        See, I mostly agree with you in that the court was not the right place for this to be decided. But with their being so much ambiguity - Krusty Oct 23, 07:07
    - I guess wikipedia knows more that the International Agency for Research on Cancer -- nm - decline Oct 23, 06:36 2
      - You realize that's a sourced attribution, right? -- nm - Reagen Oct 23, 06:42
      - "The IARC has been criticized for its assessment methodology by failing to consider the broad literature and only assessing hazard rather than risk." -- nm - TWuG Oct 23, 06:40

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.