Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 171
In response to
"
"Studies on cancer rates in people have provided conflicting results on whether the use of glyphosate containing products is associated with cancer. -- (edited)
"
by
Krusty
We need more testing and research but things don't look all that good. -- (link)
Posted by
Krusty (aka Krustylu)
Oct 23 '18, 06:40
(No message)
https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/how-toxic-is-the-worlds-most-popular-herbicide-roundup-30308
(www.the-scientist.com)
Responses:
That article discusses things other than cancer (which was what the court case focused on) and agrees that glyphosate is nontoxic, but that in
-
TWuG
Oct 23, 06:51
3
I posted it to show that science hasn't decided anything on this and that it needs more testing and research. The previous post talks about cancer. -- nm
-
Krusty
Oct 23, 06:53
2
Which is why a court decision makes no sense. "Conflicted" science doesn't become unconflicted because of a court decision, but that decision
-
TWuG
Oct 23, 07:00
1
See, I mostly agree with you in that the court was not the right place for this to be decided. But with their being so much ambiguity
-
Krusty
Oct 23, 07:07
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.