|
In response to
"Sorry, but what's not the case? (Thanks for the c&p though, I am out of free WaPo articles on my laptop)"
by
Roger More
|
I meant it's not right that the accused themselves could cross-examine the accuser.
Posted by
Inigo (aka Inigo)
Nov 16 '18, 09:19
|
It would be an attorney or adviser as the paragraph from my last post indicated.
Heh. She's always right (in her mind), but to be clear her position is that the accused need way more due process rights than they are given currently.
|