ST Alpha - "I'm not arguing Maddux or Johnson, I'm arguing you putting Glavine ahead of Pedro. That's nutty. (nm)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

In response to "Take out from 97-03, he's Koufax. 6 brilliant seasons." by Will Hunting

I'm not arguing Maddux or Johnson, I'm arguing you putting Glavine ahead of Pedro. That's nutty. (nm)

Posted by musubi May 28 '09, 11:07

.

Responses:

For a career, I prefer guys who were very good for longer time. - Will Hunting May 28, 11:11 4
- Burned out too quickly? He has 13 seasons that can be considered all-star caliber. And *wins*? This is the problem? - musubi May 28, 11:18 3
  - Pedro's career for all intents was done by age 33. - Will Hunting May 28, 11:21 2
    - It's *wins*, one of the most meaningless conventional pitching stats. (nm) - musubi May 28, 11:22 1
      - (Will has "wins" engraved on every individual one of his anal beads.) - TFox May 28, 11:25
Will only really likes one stat: wins. That means Glavine has to be before Pedro. -- nm - TFox May 28, 11:10 3
- Glavine has 1 less Cy Young award. 90 more wins. Same # of rings. - Will Hunting May 28, 11:12 2
  - So, to summarize: less than Pedro, wins, equal to Pedro, wins. - TFox May 28, 11:14 1
    - Well, when arguing about a pitcher's career, 5 full seasons of wins more is a pretty big hurdle to overcome. - Will Hunting May 28, 11:18

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.