Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 11:23
2: Nov 30, 15:54
3: Nov 30, 09:41
4: Nov 29, 16:44
5: Nov 29, 08:01
6: Nov 28, 16:19
7: Nov 28, 09:42
8: Nov 27, 18:07
9: Nov 27, 12:04
10: Nov 27, 08:26
11: Nov 26, 18:06
12: Nov 26, 12:05
13: Nov 26, 08:29
14: Nov 25, 18:33
15: Nov 25, 11:12
16: Nov 25, 07:08
17: Nov 24, 13:17
18: Nov 23, 18:13
19: Nov 23, 06:17
20: Nov 22, 13:24
Posts: 159
In response to
"
I'm not arguing Maddux or Johnson, I'm arguing you putting Glavine ahead of Pedro. That's nutty. (nm)
"
by
musubi
For a career, I prefer guys who were very good for longer time.
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz)
May 28 '09, 11:11
Pedro burned out too quick for me.
Coming up 90 wins short...that's 5 seasons behind Glavine. i can't ignore 5 full seasons.
Responses:
Burned out too quickly? He has 13 seasons that can be considered all-star caliber. And *wins*? This is the problem?
-
musubi
May 28, 11:18
3
Pedro's career for all intents was done by age 33.
-
Will Hunting
May 28, 11:21
2
It's *wins*, one of the most meaningless conventional pitching stats. (nm)
-
musubi
May 28, 11:22
1
(Will has "wins" engraved on every individual one of his anal beads.)
-
TFox
May 28, 11:25
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.