ST Alpha - "In the supercontest, the issue is that one player was betting money from Saturday’s results and the other had all his money tied up…" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "Ohhhhh! Hmmm...that's indeed important -- nm" by JD

In the supercontest, the issue is that one player was betting money from Saturday’s results and the other had all his money tied up…

Posted by Volnelk Jan 17 '19, 13:41

On the early Sunday result.

So it was an issue of timing, but not for everyone. The leader was left waiting for his winnings from the early game while other people were able to make bets with money they hadn’t wagered on the Patriots game.

Now, if some people got their Pats winnings and could bet it and the leader couldn’t, THEN he’s got a case.

Responses:

It had to do with different wagers and how they were being graded in order. Crudely, some people bet the Pats-2.5 and got paid, while... - Name Withheld By Request Jan 17, 14:00 3
- Ahhh...a virtual line based on type of bet placed - JD Jan 17, 14:05 2
  - That's just it. Part of it was the rules of the contest. You could bet whatever until Sunday which on that day, you could only bet the NFL. -- (edited) - Name Withheld By Request Jan 17, 14:06 1
    - New information based on a podcast I listened to on the way home: New Jersey and its newness to gambling also a factor. - Name Withheld By Request Jan 17, 15:53
There are indeed people who got their Pats money in time and others who didn't. -- nm - Will Hunting Jan 17, 13:49
I agree with your IM. -- nm - Strongbad, Astronauts Champion Jan 17, 13:45
The last part of your IM. That's strategy which IMO should take DK off the hook -- nm - JD Jan 17, 13:43

Post a message top

In the supercontest, the issue is that one player was betting money from Saturday’s results and the other had all his money tied up…

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.