ST Alpha - "Return of the King was 18 hours long, and that wasn't a chore to sit throug.....oh, wait -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 157

In response to "Avengers:Endgame could be the longest marvel movie ever (currently at the 3 hour mark - although edits are still ongoing) -- (link)" by decline

Return of the King was 18 hours long, and that wasn't a chore to sit throug.....oh, wait -- nm

Posted by prayformojo (aka mayhem) Feb 7 '19, 07:12

(No message)

Responses:

It's the Ebert thing about no good movie being too long and no bad movie being too short - Reagen Feb 7, 07:46 4
- I mean, we really did not need 30 minutes of Dwarf Dinner Party with Bilbo. -- nm - groiny Feb 7, 07:47 3
  - The key offender - Reagen Feb 7, 07:50 1
    - I kinda liked the throwing the plates and shit around, and the Bilbo song they did, but man did that scene last forever. - groiny Feb 7, 07:55
  - That wasn’t in the original trilogy. (The Star Wars nerd nt.) -- nm - Qale Feb 7, 07:48
The Hobbit for me, was way more of a slog than any of the LOTR movies. -- nm - groiny Feb 7, 07:45 2
- The first one, for sure. The other two I didn't even bother to see, so I can't say for sure. -- nm - Roger More Feb 7, 07:47 1
  - the 2nd and 3rd were better, but it still SEEMED to drag in a lot more places than LOTR. -- nm - groiny Feb 7, 07:48

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.