|
In response to
"I hate to be flip, but this feels as obvious as that non-PI call. -- nm"
by
Reagen
|
I'm reading the article and jay-zuss kee-rist.
|
I thought I wouldn't be surprised until I read the part about the State of Alabama producing no information. It's not just a decision along the lines of "it's not a violation of the First Amendment in this particular situation due to safety considerations in a prison" (which I expected even in the face of Cutter v. Wilkinson).
But instead, the Court is essentially saying "we don't need no steenkin' evidence!"
This just galls me.
|
Responses:
|