Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 30, 15:54
2: Nov 30, 09:41
3: Nov 29, 16:44
4: Nov 29, 08:01
5: Nov 28, 16:19
6: Nov 28, 09:42
7: Nov 27, 18:07
8: Nov 27, 12:04
9: Nov 27, 08:26
10: Nov 26, 18:06
11: Nov 26, 12:05
12: Nov 26, 08:29
13: Nov 25, 18:33
14: Nov 25, 11:12
15: Nov 25, 07:08
16: Nov 24, 13:17
17: Nov 23, 18:13
18: Nov 23, 06:17
19: Nov 22, 13:24
20: Nov 22, 09:09
Posts: 163
In response to
"
She is getting legal advice from a former Supreme Court judge on what she can and cannot say, but some legal experts are weighing in and suggest...
"
by
Name Withheld By Request
I'm still in the BFD camp -- nm
Posted by
mud
Feb 12 '19, 08:59
(No message)
Responses:
it's not the crime it's the coverup. If they're lying now about what they asked her to do they are Fed -- nm
-
Beaker
Feb 12, 09:00
Just test the hypothesis if it was a conservative Prime Minister and a case against someone like Suncor or Enbridge. If you can still say BFD then...
-
Name Withheld By Request
Feb 12, 09:00
4
I agreed with MacDonald's article on B2 and like I said above, it's not the crime (which for me is BFD) it's the cover-up/lying if that is happening -- nm
-
Beaker
Feb 12, 09:08
2
I got where MacDonald was going with his column, but it's kind of an asinine argument when boiled down.
-
Name Withheld By Request
Feb 12, 09:37
Also: the BC Chiefs are rallying to her side now; this could really go south fast...er than it already is -- (link)
-
Beaker
Feb 12, 09:09
I always do that. -- nm
-
mud
Feb 12, 09:06
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
