In response to
"are any of those 49 people going to be not-dead? -- nm"
by
Andie
|
So the definition of "something" in this case is A) Reviving the dead or B) Going back in time to prevent it? -- nm
Posted by
Strongbad (aka Rambler14)
Mar 15 '19, 05:56
|
(No message)
|
Responses:
-
C) Actually doing something to stop this from happening in the future instead of praying and talking about how you'd
-
Krusty
Mar 15, 06:04
-
I read it as "let's take some type of actual action to hopefully prevent this type of tragedy, instead of the typical 'thoughts and prayers.'" -- nm
-
JaxSean
Mar 15, 05:59
-
or, you know, stopping it from happening again.
-
Andie
Mar 15, 05:57
- [deleted]
36
-
Let's just accept the original message for what it is.
-
Strongbad
Mar 15, 06:01
35
-
James 2:26 "For as the body without spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also."
-
oblique
Mar 15, 06:10
3
-
I mean, if you are going to just invent something preposterous and put it in her mouth, why not imply she was saying something like
-
Marlowe
Mar 15, 06:08
-
uh, that's really not what she's saying -- nm
-
decline
Mar 15, 06:05
-
That's not it at all. It's just that a lot of us want actual action on this issue and all we get are thoughts and prayers. -- nm
-
Krusty
Mar 15, 06:05
-
That's not it AT ALL. Many of us have been saying for a long time that thoughts and prayers are *not enough*.
-
ty97
Mar 15, 06:04
23
- [deleted]
-
No, that’s not it at all. -- nm
-
Super Daddy Princess
Mar 15, 06:03
-
yes, let's take it at face value. prayers are NOT going to help if nothing else is done. if prayer helps you, that is wonderful. Then when you leave
-
Andie
Mar 15, 06:03
-
I don't get that at all. -- nm
-
Beaker
Mar 15, 06:02
|
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
|
|