Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 5, 12:51
2: Dec 5, 10:39
3: Dec 5, 07:07
4: Dec 4, 18:10
5: Dec 4, 12:27
6: Dec 4, 09:36
7: Dec 4, 02:38
8: Dec 3, 14:19
9: Dec 3, 11:17
10: Dec 3, 07:33
11: Dec 2, 17:22
12: Dec 2, 11:48
13: Dec 2, 08:21
14: Dec 1, 17:33
15: Dec 1, 11:23
16: Nov 30, 15:54
17: Nov 30, 09:41
18: Nov 29, 16:44
19: Nov 29, 08:01
20: Nov 28, 16:19
Posts: 155
Sitwap, but this is some BS from the Jackets-Bruins series.
Posted by
Volnelk
May 9 '19, 14:21
Penalty during game 6. Reviewed during the game and they decide it’s only a two minute penalty.
THEN
The Bruins win the game and as a result, the series
THEN
The league reviews the penalty and suspends the guy for game one.
How in the hell is that fair?
http://www.espn.com/nhl/story/_/id/26695139/bruins-mcavoy-suspended-game-1-vs-canes
(www.espn.com)
Responses:
just to note, it wasn't reviewed during the game. There's no provision to do that. -- nm
-
Reagen
May 9, 14:29
3
Then they took a hell of a long time to decide what the penalty was. -- nm
-
Volnelk
May 9, 14:41
2
They get to confer among the officials, but they're only allowed to go off what they saw themselves. -- nm
-
Reagen
May 9, 14:42
1
Announcers made it seem like at the time that they were looking at it. Oh well. -- nm
-
Volnelk
May 9, 14:43
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.