ST Alpha - "If there weren't separate tests then you would have a proof positive. You don't have that because you only got 1 test result. " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "H1N1 is a subset. it's not "separate" -- nm" by loosiflu

If there weren't separate tests then you would have a proof positive. You don't have that because you only got 1 test result.

Posted by Redmond (aka Redmond) Jun 1 '09, 17:33

Hence that would mean there are two separate tests.

Responses:

the reason why CDC isn't testing is because they're assuming all new Flu A is H1N1. -- nm - loosiflu Jun 1, 17:34 7
- Assuming makes an ass out of you and me -- nm - Redmond Jun 1, 17:34 6
  - No, cuz you were already an ass. Hahahaha! -- nm - mara Jun 1, 17:40 1
    - :) I knew someone would jump on that. -- nm - Redmond Jun 1, 17:41
  - testing everyone when you know it's H1N1 is a stupid waste of money. -- nm - loosiflu Jun 1, 17:35 3
    - They don't KNOW it's H1N1. You said there are still a small number of cases of type A. - Redmond Jun 1, 17:37 2
      - Seriously dude. You are becoming an ass about this. The diagnostic guidelines have been changed. A positive test for Flu A is currently considered - loosiflu Jun 1, 17:47 1
        
        I'm not being an ass. You posted in the thread my name, and it generated my response. You used my name as a tweak. - Redmond Jun 1, 17:49

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.