Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 18:10
2: Dec 4, 12:27
3: Dec 4, 09:36
4: Dec 4, 02:38
5: Dec 3, 14:19
6: Dec 3, 11:17
7: Dec 3, 07:33
8: Dec 2, 17:22
9: Dec 2, 11:48
10: Dec 2, 08:21
11: Dec 1, 17:33
12: Dec 1, 11:23
13: Nov 30, 15:54
14: Nov 30, 09:41
15: Nov 29, 16:44
16: Nov 29, 08:01
17: Nov 28, 16:19
18: Nov 28, 09:42
19: Nov 27, 18:07
20: Nov 27, 12:04
Posts: 158
In response to
"
Are you talking about getting rid of the Electoral College? That would require a constitutional amendment or a constitutional convention. -- nm
"
by
Inigo
Google this. You'll find the story fascinating. -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Jun 11 '19, 10:08
(No message)
Responses:
I didn’t realize how close it is. -- nm
-
Super Daddy Princess
Jun 11, 10:16
6
Yeah, and it's picking up steam. I know some conservatives who are in freakout mode about it.
-
David
Jun 11, 10:17
5
I don’t see it happening anytime soon honestly. Having trouble seeing a path to 270 without the Dems making serious inroads in certain state legislatures -- nm*
-
Super Daddy Princess
Jun 11, 10:36
I've seen this before. It's clever, but I think it dies in lawsuit hell before it ever happens. -- nm
-
Inigo
Jun 11, 10:20
3
Since it's the law in several states now, that's unlikely.
-
David
Jun 11, 10:24
2
It's not the same as a constitutional amendment though because changing tides in states can change the laws. It's a clever but very imperfect
-
pmb
Jun 11, 11:07
1
Right, and they're going to have to convince a red/swing to put them over 270. -- (edited)
-
Inigo
Jun 11, 11:11
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
