ST Alpha - "BUT, that's just on an individual level. It compounds as the usage goes up/parallelizes, so it's somewhat effective in that way. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "Kind of like giving a $100 speeding ticket to a billionaire. -- nm" by Beryllium

BUT, that's just on an individual level. It compounds as the usage goes up/parallelizes, so it's somewhat effective in that way. -- nm

Posted by Beryllium (aka grayman) Jun 12 '19, 09:27

(No message)

Responses:

It's still regressive. -- nm - mud Jun 12, 09:29 6
- Lets keep the poor people off our roads! -- nm - I am shloot! Jun 12, 09:32 5
  - What would a progressive carbon tax look like? -- nm - Beryllium Jun 12, 09:50 4
    - First thought would be to offset it with a refundable income tax credit -- nm - Super Daddy Princess Jun 12, 10:00 3
      - It's also been suggested that taking the carbon tax profits and directing them toward services for those in need would help to offset regressiveness. - Beryllium Jun 12, 10:12 2
        
        Except those taxes paid by multinational corporations will just get added to the cost of goods, so the consumer ends up paying anyway. -- (edited) - Super Daddy Princess Jun 12, 10:27 1
        
        Counter-argument: The current state of the world acts as a subsidy to those corporations, which effectively compounds the emissions problem. - Beryllium Jun 12, 10:30

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.