ST Alpha - "The time when the Nets gave up the future for Boston's aging, no longer stars players? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

In response to "Remember that time the Nets traded for Boston's stars and they became that dynasty everyone was saying? " by Bacon

The time when the Nets gave up the future for Boston's aging, no longer stars players? -- nm

Posted by JD (aka Jason Dean) Jun 30 '19, 16:14

(No message)

Responses:

Yes that time! -- nm - Bacon Jun 30, 16:14 7
- So, not the same thing at all -- nm - Krusty Jun 30, 16:15 6
  - Correct. That time those players didn't have ripped Achilles and could play right away and didn't have to have a year off to rehab. - Bacon Jun 30, 16:16 5
    - Kyrie is 27, KD is 30. We didn't trade any picks at all, just paid cash. Before the injury KD was considered the best in the game. - Krusty Jun 30, 16:19 4
      - You are right. You didn't give up anything but cash this time. - Bacon Jun 30, 16:21 3
        
        So many are so sure this won't work out but these guys are friends that want to play together. Let's see what happens before we declare it - Krusty Jun 30, 16:25 2
        
        The Knick owner is driving players away imo. He's such a dick I think stars don't want to play for him. Dude needs to sell the team -- nm - Bacon Jun 30, 16:26 1
        
        They wouldn't offer Durant a max deal. They saved and dumped games and in the end they failed at both the draft and FA. -- nm - Krusty Jun 30, 16:30

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.