ST Alpha - "Maybe people see it as the remake for Psycho. Just because it’s the same doesn’t mean it’s good. Sprinkle in a dash of ‘why do we need this?’....." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 157

In response to "Metacritic is at 56 (28 reviews). I don't get it." by Marlowe

Maybe people see it as the remake for Psycho. Just because it’s the same doesn’t mean it’s good. Sprinkle in a dash of ‘why do we need this?’.....

Posted by Volnelk Jul 11 '19, 10:29

And you get bad reviews.

From the announcement I thought it was strange because it’s not really live-action because there are no humans. It’s just another version of an animated movie.

Responses:

People harshed on TS 4 for being pointless and it's at least a new story. -- nm* - Reagen Jul 11, 10:46 1
- Is it? -- nm - Cuzzin Todd Jul 11, 10:53
Yeah, the Vince Vaughn Psycho comparison is exactly what I was thinking about as a comp. Plus, who's to say that the medium doesn't matter? - Name Withheld By Request Jul 11, 10:38 3
- Marshall McLuhan? - Beryllium Jul 11, 10:40
- Maybe it does. David Ehrlich, which is someone I like to read, one of the few even, goes a bit through that road. (NM) - Marlowe Jul 11, 10:39
- Uncanny Valley is a thing. -- nm - Reagen Jul 11, 10:39

Post a message top

Maybe people see it as the remake for Psycho. Just because it’s the same doesn’t mean it’s good. Sprinkle in a dash of ‘why do we need this?’.....

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.