ST Alpha - "If you can play multiple TE via flex I wouldn't do it still. I think you can get more if you do trade. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "Do you have to drop a decent player for the room? Ekeler is meh even if Gordon doesn't play -- nm" by Bacon

If you can play multiple TE via flex I wouldn't do it still. I think you can get more if you do trade. -- nm

Posted by Bacon (aka Redmond) Aug 26 '19, 07:18

(No message)

Responses:

more thoughts. In PPR I would be trading Kelce for a super stud player not two RBs one that could be great again if the QB fits and the other meh meh -- nm - Bacon Aug 26, 07:20 2
- yeah, I hear ya. That's my concern -- nm - CQ Aug 26, 07:21 1
  - I think Jackson (assuming Gordon doesn't play) eventually takes the RB1 duties from Ekeler. He's more explosive - Bacon Aug 26, 07:23
I mean, it's a pretty decent trade. I'm thin at RB too. David Johnson, Latavius, D. Lewis, and Mattison -- nm - CQ Aug 26, 07:20 5
- If it wasn't PPR it's fine, but Kelce should be getting you a bit more than that IMO -- nm - Bacon Aug 26, 07:21 4
  - TE is such a hard position to fill also. It's like you have two unicorns -- nm - Bacon Aug 26, 07:24 3
    - daft night, I couldn't help myself. I was laughing -- nm - CQ Aug 26, 07:25 2
      - Can you use 2 TE with a flex option? -- nm - Bacon Aug 26, 07:27 1
        
        If this is an option, I'd just stick with both TEs. -- nm - Shaun Aug 26, 07:29

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.