ST Alpha - "I think the question of "egregiousness" is how early the DB hit him. I think the conceptually they are getting at how obvious the call is, not how " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

In response to "Take 2: Here's that pass interference non-call against Marquise Brown from a different source. -- (link)" by Inigo

I think the question of "egregiousness" is how early the DB hit him. I think the conceptually they are getting at how obvious the call is, not how

Posted by pmb (aka pmb) Sep 16 '19, 12:17

badly he was interfered with. Given that they see it as more of a judgment call they are trying not to interfere with the flow of the game on this one. I agree it was pass interference. I'm just not sure he got there so early it was obvious.

Responses:

Unless they gave him credit for doing a fireman's carry at the time of arrival; it's obvious. - Will Hunting Sep 16, 12:25 2
- not touching, can't get mad -- nm - oblique Sep 16, 12:50 1
  - Not...touching? He's halfway to being carried down a ladder by the time the ball gets there. -- nm - Will Hunting Sep 16, 12:58

Post a message top

I think the question of "egregiousness" is how early the DB hit him. I think the conceptually they are getting at how obvious the call is, not how

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.