Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 10, 18:15
2: Dec 10, 12:28
3: Dec 10, 09:30
4: Dec 10, 05:59
5: Dec 9, 17:07
6: Dec 9, 13:47
7: Dec 9, 10:33
8: Dec 9, 07:33
9: Dec 8, 17:50
10: Dec 8, 10:32
11: Dec 8, 06:23
12: Dec 7, 16:52
13: Dec 7, 07:17
14: Dec 6, 14:40
15: Dec 6, 10:07
16: Dec 6, 07:32
17: Dec 5, 19:48
18: Dec 5, 12:51
19: Dec 5, 10:39
20: Dec 5, 07:07
Posts: 157
Andrew Johnson was brought up on impeachment for what amounted to a statutory act. -- nm
Posted by
Reagen
Sep 24 '19, 16:36
(No message)
Responses:
How so? They impeached him for violating the specific letter of the constitution. I know we’ve taken this to plaid when Benjamin Franklin - not presen
-
JackDawson
Sep 24, 16:48
9
Can you explain Articles 10 and 11 of Johnson's impeachment then to a layman? -- (edited)
-
Max
Sep 24, 17:10
3
I don't understand how the harmless error doctrine relates here (below) -- nm*
-
Max
Sep 24, 18:42
1
It makes no difference because they clearly impeached based on crimes and misdemeanors. In any case if you firmly believe the congress does or should
-
JackDawson
Sep 24, 19:29
The harmless error doctrine. The allegations are sufficient to support an indictment on valid counts -- nm
-
JackDawson
Sep 24, 18:30
I'm just saying if we're calling that a "high crime"... -- nm
-
Reagen
Sep 24, 17:04
3
“Other” -- nm
-
JackDawson
Sep 24, 18:31
constant treason route seems obvious -- nm
-
con_carne
Sep 24, 17:29
1
"I am a maaaaaaan of constant treason ..." heheh -- nm
-
Beryllium
Sep 24, 17:56
I'm really not arguing that "offending America" is a viable standard. I just am arguing that it is potentially broader than your reading. -- nm
-
pmb
Sep 24, 16:53
Go the Capone route and get Trump for falsifying the weather report.
-
Max
Sep 24, 16:41
7
Wasn’t that an actual crime in the 19th century under things like the alien and sedition acts and the like? The 1A was not interpreted in the way you
-
JackDawson
Sep 24, 18:33
Exactly. What about his threats to the press. Is that not undermining the first amendment? That recent story about the administration not
-
pmb
Sep 24, 16:56
4
Sounds like “impeach no matter what because we’ve determined he’s a threat standard”
-
JackDawson
Sep 24, 18:37
3
Are you saying the Ukraine thing doesn't cross that line? -- nm
-
.
Sep 24, 19:50
2
Huh? It’s way beyond the line. Huh?
-
JackDawson
Sep 24, 19:54
1
I'm obviously missing some context in this discussion.
-
.
Sep 24, 20:33
Sure. I mean, if we’re being accused of wanting to impeach from Day One, might as well dump it all at the Senate’s doorstep. -- nm
-
Qale
Sep 24, 16:50
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.