ST Alpha - "but not, like, right now. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "If he’s impeached, he should absolutely have the right to question and confront his accuser at his trial -- nm" by JackDawson

but not, like, right now. -- nm

Posted by Reagen Sep 29 '19, 17:21

(No message)

Responses:

Federal law prohibits it now so... -- nm - JackDawson Sep 29, 17:21 7
- just how does this work when it's someone under witsec, to pick a ohhhh random example when someone's testifying against the Mob? -- nm - Reagen Sep 29, 17:24 6
  - But like, there’s only so much protection one can create for his life his reputation his loved ones - JackDawson Sep 29, 17:33
  - They come in to testifying at the trial under protection then leave again - JackDawson Sep 29, 17:32 4
    - also, isn't the whistleblower somewhat irrelevant now? - Reagen Sep 29, 18:36 3
      - Yes - challenge for case is to get the people with direct knowledge to testify - JackDawson Sep 29, 19:07 1
        
        But if the whistleblower is really a witness to witnesses, is the wb really the accuser? - Max Sep 29, 21:11
      - dont care. If I can finds 'im I'm gonna git 'im -- nm - trumpet Sep 29, 18:56

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.