ST Alpha - "also, isn't the whistleblower somewhat irrelevant now?" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "They come in to testifying at the trial under protection then leave again " by JackDawson

also, isn't the whistleblower somewhat irrelevant now?

Posted by Reagen Sep 29 '19, 18:36

Like, it's as if he said "hey, someone told me guys were selling drugs on this street corner", then cops went to that street corner and then they tried to sell drugs to a uniformed officer, then tried to argue that selling drugs was legal.

Responses:

Yes - challenge for case is to get the people with direct knowledge to testify - JackDawson Sep 29, 19:07 1
- But if the whistleblower is really a witness to witnesses, is the wb really the accuser? - Max Sep 29, 21:11
dont care. If I can finds 'im I'm gonna git 'im -- nm - trumpet Sep 29, 18:56

Post a message top

also, isn't the whistleblower somewhat irrelevant now?

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.