|
In response to
"The case against it is that it's being used as a punitive measure, rather than an equitable one to right the wrong"
by
Roger More
|
That’s the superficial argument - the crux is that the statute says we can get “injunction, penalties, and all other equitable relief the court seems
Posted by
JackDawson (aka dawson)
Nov 1 '19, 14:31
|
Just”
And that because making someone lay back money they stole isn’t explicitly mentioned it’s not valid (because it’s not equitable as punitive)
|