In response to
"That’s a tough case if both sides are telling the truth. It’s a jury I’d actually want to be on because it’d be fascinating. -- nm"
by
Qale
|
I agree. As presented, there are enough details that you can see why the bank might be dubious. But then another bank went ahead and took the checks.
|
So, giant ASCII shrug from me. I guess it comes down to whether you think the bank's actions were reasonable in context.
|
Responses:
|