Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 153
In response to
"
I’m guessing it’s the Bolton for Biden trade.
"
by
spamlet
There is no way its that.
Posted by
Jovian (aka Jovian)
Jan 28 '20, 15:43
Dems aren't going to agree to swap.
It undercuts everything.
Responses:
Where are we on all the subpoenaed House witnesses who wouldn't testify until there was a SCOTUS ruling? -- nm
-
Mop
Jan 28, 16:05
3
No change. Bolton is different because he said he's willing to testify. But, Trump will assert executive privilege and then this will head to the
-
pmb
Jan 28, 16:07
2
If only the head of the ruling body that will make this decision was somehow involved in this trial... -- nm
-
Mop
Jan 28, 16:17
1
That’s not how the system works. -- nm
-
spamlet
Jan 28, 16:29
They can't spend 5 weeks complaining that the trial is a sham because they don't allow evidence to be brought in and then backpedal..
-
Marlowe
Jan 28, 15:54
let them call Hunter. It has zero bearing, it's a distraction tactic. -- nm
-
Remlik
Jan 28, 15:53
8
It won't sway the deplorables who will forever believe he had something to hide, but the fence sitters...
-
Mop
Jan 28, 16:07
7
As I said yesterday, you all are underplaying the ability of the lawyers to make Biden look bad simply by innuendo and being forced to testify in that
-
pmb
Jan 28, 16:09
5
I'm with Marlowe, though. Even if this damages daddy, we have other Democrats. -- nm
-
Mop
Jan 28, 16:12
4
It's just wrong and unfair. It may happen but it's not something that should be traded. -- nm
-
pmb
Jan 28, 16:17
3
I agree it shouldn't be traded. But how else to get Bolton to testify? -- nm
-
Remlik
Jan 28, 16:42
2
As I said, they are under pressure to have him testify. Dems don't have to give them what they want to make it happen. They don't have the votes to
-
pmb
Jan 28, 16:52
1
Because of the book leak the Repubs don't have the leverage they had before. And the more leaks the less leverage they have. -- nm
-
.
Jan 28, 16:56
right? -- nm
-
Remlik
Jan 28, 16:08
It’s the only chance they have to get testimony from Bolton which is the end goal at this point. -- nm
-
spamlet
Jan 28, 15:52
5
I disagree. Either way it's not going to change the outcome. So they're in a position now where they either look like they care about the facts or
-
pmb
Jan 28, 16:01
I don't see the point if it doesn't result in removal. They'll get Bolton's info when the book is out six weeks later. -- nm
-
Max
Jan 28, 15:56
1
He’s not getting removed so they want to damage him as much as possible. The only reasonable way to do that is Bolton at this point. -- nm
-
spamlet
Jan 28, 16:12
says who?
-
Jovian
Jan 28, 15:53
1
spamlet just did. -- nm
-
Cuzzin Todd
Jan 28, 16:48
It may not work out as a trade. If they can't block Bolton then they'll ask for Biden and the dems can't block that.
-
pmb
Jan 28, 15:45
1
oh yea, I fully expect them to call Hunter, Santa, the tooth fairy. But they certainly arent going to be horse trading on this. -- nm
-
Jovian
Jan 28, 15:52
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.