Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 11:23
2: Nov 30, 15:54
3: Nov 30, 09:41
4: Nov 29, 16:44
5: Nov 29, 08:01
6: Nov 28, 16:19
7: Nov 28, 09:42
8: Nov 27, 18:07
9: Nov 27, 12:04
10: Nov 27, 08:26
11: Nov 26, 18:06
12: Nov 26, 12:05
13: Nov 26, 08:29
14: Nov 25, 18:33
15: Nov 25, 11:12
16: Nov 25, 07:08
17: Nov 24, 13:17
18: Nov 23, 18:13
19: Nov 23, 06:17
20: Nov 22, 13:24
Posts: 156
I think this could be entrapment -- (link)
Posted by
JD (aka Jason Dean)
Feb 3 '20, 17:41
(No message)
I mean I might be able to understand if it was say Applebee's but really? Who's gonna believe that someone would 'work' for Chili's?
(thesmokinggun.com)
Responses:
*sniff sniff* "GAWWEDAMMIT, WHO PUT FOOD IN THE EVIDENCE LOCKUP?!?"
-
Patrol Sergeant, 3 weeks later
Feb 3, 18:09
And he was dumb enough to think a burger would substitute for $80?? -- nm
-
Meg
Feb 3, 18:03
2
That's my entrapment claim. Oh..wait.
-
JD
Feb 3, 18:07
1
Playing in my head....~ Hungry, Hungry, Hooker ~ -- nm
-
Meg
Feb 3, 18:12
Your honor, my client should go free because the burger never made it into evidence. -- nm
-
Max
Feb 3, 17:51
2
If there's a stronger case for habeas carnis, I've never seen it. -- nm
-
Beron Cherry
Feb 3, 17:55
1
if the burger wasn't bit, you must acquit -- nm
-
zeitgeist
Feb 3, 18:47
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.