from b2, and caucus talk - no one mentioned the accusations of cheating by pete.
Posted by
b. (aka starrynit)
Feb 10 '20, 16:38
|
sanders supporters think there just had to be cheating for pete to do well, despite his massive ground game with relational canvassing, despite results showing he did very well with first time caucus-goers and with counties that had turned from obama to trump and that he won in more counties than obama did even discounting the disputed ones. also that different polls leading up to last week made it so that it shouldn't have been a surprise if any of the top 4 won. also that there would have to have been a massive conspiracy across the state, include other candidates reps, and more.
check any pete post on twitter; and you'll likely see cheating characterizations, including incredibly gross, bigoted ones. also bot amplification within moments of new posts.
the crazies are already saying there's no way pete can win NH, and if he does it'll be due to cheating. nevada, too, as someone who had worked for his campaign left it and took a job in state election oversight. (oof.)
he waited until sanders asked for recanvassing to make his own request; but I think I saw yesterday that it can't actually change results per some high-level lawyer, so it may be just for appearance's sake for both.
|