Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 154
In response to
"
David in terms of chances of winning I’d probably rank them Biden Bloomberg Amy Warren Pete and Bernie -- nm
"
by
JackDawson
The primary , the general - or both? -- nm
Posted by
Beryllium (aka grayman)
Feb 22 '20, 17:45
(No message)
Responses:
The general— the primary is probably inverted -- nm
-
JackDawson
Feb 22, 18:20
6
There is literally nothing that makes me think Biden could win easier than almost any of them. Maybe Pete.
-
Name Withheld By Request
Feb 22, 18:23
4
Re: the name calling, I think it's all being tuned out at this point. Trump's at an 11 all the time and his pitch is ignored by all but the converted. -- nm
-
Reagen
Feb 22, 18:41
have to admit, i'm stunned at how 'old manish' he has become -- nm
-
zeitgeist
Feb 22, 18:39
He'd get votes in spite of himself thanks to Obama. He's closer to being the strongest in the main. -- nm*
-
David
Feb 22, 18:33
Fair enough the Biden position may be wrong -- nm
-
JackDawson
Feb 22, 18:30
Fortunately, Biden is an absolutely awful campaigner. -- nm
-
Tim
Feb 22, 18:23
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
