ST Alpha - "hold on, so *no* winner take all states?" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "amanda, I left an example of how delegate math works on B2 -- nm" by ty97

hold on, so no winner take all states?

Posted by Reagen Mar 3 '20, 20:18

You should really clarify this.

Responses:

Wait, are there any winner take all states? -- nm - David Mar 3, 20:20 13
- I think maybe one or two. There'd have to be. -- nm - Reagen Mar 3, 20:20 12
  - My understanding is no. All are using the same system. -- nm - pmb Mar 3, 20:24 1
    - I feel like someone would have told me prior to this. -- nm - Reagen Mar 3, 20:25
  - Poor ty is the most helpful, innately kind person, and the universe just *crushes* him for it. -- nm - David Mar 3, 20:21 1
    - Not his fault he’s so old -- nm - JackDawson Mar 3, 20:25
  - I used to live in California and I am 100% certain that it's a winner take all state. -- nm - Bacon Mar 3, 20:21 7
    - That's a negative (although the Republican primary might be) -- nm - con_carne Mar 3, 20:27
    - How much money will your wife let you lose? Let’s bet that. -- nm - Will Hunting Mar 3, 20:23 5
      - Ty, tell Will how right I am please. -- nm - Bacon Mar 3, 20:24 4
        
        The California *GOP* primary is Winner take all where a candidate exceeds 50% statewide. Otherwise, proportional to candidates receiving 20% or more. -- nm - ty97 Mar 3, 20:25 3
        
        Okay okay, I worded my joke wrong and ruined the thread David started. THERE!! -- nm - Bacon Mar 3, 20:30 2
        
        Haha, I knew you were messing around, and I gave you an informative answer anyway, so take that! -- nm - ty97 Mar 3, 20:40 1
        
        Meanie Head! -- nm - Bacon Mar 3, 20:42

Post a message top

hold on, so *no* winner take all states?

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.

hold on, so no winner take all states?