Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 30, 15:54
2: Nov 30, 09:41
3: Nov 29, 16:44
4: Nov 29, 08:01
5: Nov 28, 16:19
6: Nov 28, 09:42
7: Nov 27, 18:07
8: Nov 27, 12:04
9: Nov 27, 08:26
10: Nov 26, 18:06
11: Nov 26, 12:05
12: Nov 26, 08:29
13: Nov 25, 18:33
14: Nov 25, 11:12
15: Nov 25, 07:08
16: Nov 24, 13:17
17: Nov 23, 18:13
18: Nov 23, 06:17
19: Nov 22, 13:24
20: Nov 22, 09:09
Posts: 156
Comparing it to the 1918 flu, which killed 17-100 million ... I dunno.
Posted by
Beryllium (aka grayman)
Mar 11 '20, 18:57
Mathematically it could kill 200+ million globally.
I doubt it gets above 1 million.
But I could be wrong.
But even then, that's still an unfathomable number of deaths to me.
Responses:
The Spanish flu was a rank amateur -- nm
-
Yersinia pestis
Mar 11, 19:00
If the 1918 flu happened now, with the medical treatments we have, what would those numbers be? -- nm
-
Bacon
Mar 11, 18:59
1
Great question. The mortality percentage could mean a higher comparative tally due to larger population, but the treatments would push it lower. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Mar 11, 19:06
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.