ST Alpha - "I’d expect us to have more just because of population. That’s not overly surprising. " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "Welp. -- (link)" by David

I’d expect us to have more just because of population. That’s not overly surprising.

Posted by spamlet Mar 15 '20, 12:59

I mean the curve is obviously bad and is going to get worse but these things should be done cases per some number of people not raw numbers.

Responses:

The growth is faster, is the point. -- nm - Reagen Mar 15, 13:01 6
- And the data is inaccurate, is also the point -- nm - Beryllium Mar 15, 13:04 5
  - If anything, it's way low here. -- nm - David Mar 15, 13:12 3
    - That's what I mean. The numbers could be waaaay different in real life, but because there is no testing ... it's all a WAG. -- nm - Beryllium Mar 15, 13:20 1
      - (I'd like to say that "was no testing" is more accurate, but I'm not so sure that it would be) -- nm - Beryllium Mar 15, 13:20
    - You mean with all our great testing? -- nm - Spawn Mar 15, 13:16
  - I'd agree that a conclusion is difficult based off that data. -- nm - Reagen Mar 15, 13:07

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.