Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 151
In response to
"
I’d expect us to have more just because of population. That’s not overly surprising.
"
by
spamlet
The growth is faster, is the point. -- nm
Posted by
Reagen
Mar 15 '20, 13:01
(No message)
Responses:
And the data is inaccurate, is also the point -- nm
-
Beryllium
Mar 15, 13:04
5
If anything, it's way low here. -- nm
-
David
Mar 15, 13:12
3
That's what I mean. The numbers could be waaaay different in real life, but because there is no testing ... it's all a WAG. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Mar 15, 13:20
1
(I'd like to say that "was no testing" is more accurate, but I'm not so sure that it would be) -- nm
-
Beryllium
Mar 15, 13:20
You mean with all our great testing? -- nm
-
Spawn
Mar 15, 13:16
I'd agree that a conclusion is difficult based off that data. -- nm
-
Reagen
Mar 15, 13:07
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
