Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 12, 08:55
2: Dec 11, 23:59
3: Dec 11, 14:43
4: Dec 11, 11:29
5: Dec 11, 07:59
6: Dec 10, 18:15
7: Dec 10, 12:28
8: Dec 10, 09:30
9: Dec 10, 05:59
10: Dec 9, 17:07
11: Dec 9, 13:47
12: Dec 9, 10:33
13: Dec 9, 07:33
14: Dec 8, 17:50
15: Dec 8, 10:32
16: Dec 8, 06:23
17: Dec 7, 16:52
18: Dec 7, 07:17
19: Dec 6, 14:40
20: Dec 6, 10:07
Posts: 155
In response to
"
In the extreme examples it’s do you kill an innocent baby in the cradle to save one million lives? What about 10? Contra, do you lose 200 million jobs
"
by
JackDawson
But it's not an A/B choice
Posted by
Reagen
Mar 25 '20, 10:28
we can both save the economy *and* save lives. In fact, you can't save the economy without saving lives.
Responses:
I don’t think I’m saying it’s A/B of course it isn’t. I’m just saying that the pearl clutching over lives will be lost is silly. Everyone is saying th
-
JackDawson
Mar 25, 10:32
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.