Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 10, 18:15
2: Dec 10, 12:28
3: Dec 10, 09:30
4: Dec 10, 05:59
5: Dec 9, 17:07
6: Dec 9, 13:47
7: Dec 9, 10:33
8: Dec 9, 07:33
9: Dec 8, 17:50
10: Dec 8, 10:32
11: Dec 8, 06:23
12: Dec 7, 16:52
13: Dec 7, 07:17
14: Dec 6, 14:40
15: Dec 6, 10:07
16: Dec 6, 07:32
17: Dec 5, 19:48
18: Dec 5, 12:51
19: Dec 5, 10:39
20: Dec 5, 07:07
Posts: 158
In response to
"
Senators are still talking? -- nm
"
by
ty97
Graham, et al. have stalled it with their problem of it helping people who got laid off. Now Bernie is threatening to hold it up too unless they stop -- nm
Posted by
decline (aka Decline)
Mar 25 '20, 12:38
(No message)
Responses:
If I’m reading it right, their point is that people would get more pay from unemployment than they were getting paid by working.
-
Dano
Mar 25, 12:47
3
I don't get how that would work? Unemployment will pay 100% for four months is my understanding.
-
ty97
Mar 25, 12:51
1
They say the way the bill is written it's your unemployment amount + $600 with no cap at what you were making. -- nm
-
Dano
Mar 25, 13:16
right, but it's not like you can just decide to be laid off -- nm
-
decline
Mar 25, 12:50
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.