Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 12, 08:55
2: Dec 11, 23:59
3: Dec 11, 14:43
4: Dec 11, 11:29
5: Dec 11, 07:59
6: Dec 10, 18:15
7: Dec 10, 12:28
8: Dec 10, 09:30
9: Dec 10, 05:59
10: Dec 9, 17:07
11: Dec 9, 13:47
12: Dec 9, 10:33
13: Dec 9, 07:33
14: Dec 8, 17:50
15: Dec 8, 10:32
16: Dec 8, 06:23
17: Dec 7, 16:52
18: Dec 7, 07:17
19: Dec 6, 14:40
20: Dec 6, 10:07
Posts: 154
In response to
"
NYC 47,439 (+4300). NY state (includes NYC) 83,712 (+7917). Out of 15,694 new tests -- (link)
"
by
ty97
50% were positive?? -- nm
Posted by
Andie
Apr 1 '20, 12:43
(No message)
Responses:
not the first time we've had that rate. We're not really testing random people from what I can tell
-
ty97
Apr 1, 12:47
1
so I'm almost surprised that it is *only* 50% -- nm
-
ty97
Apr 1, 12:48
Makes sense since they're only testing like extreme symptoms -- nm
-
JackDawson
Apr 1, 12:46
Given that you're only generally able to get tested if you're displaying the relevant symptoms, I don't think that's too surprising.
-
pmb
Apr 1, 12:46
5
an antibody test would do amazing things to getting people back out into the world
-
Pippy- blueberry bungie jumper
Apr 1, 12:52
4
Yep. -- nm
-
pmb
Apr 1, 13:11
100000% yes -- nm
-
ty97
Apr 1, 13:09
yes and yes. Put me out there. -- nm
-
JackDawson
Apr 1, 13:08
exactly this! -- nm
-
Andie
Apr 1, 12:53
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
