Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 30, 15:54
2: Nov 30, 09:41
3: Nov 29, 16:44
4: Nov 29, 08:01
5: Nov 28, 16:19
6: Nov 28, 09:42
7: Nov 27, 18:07
8: Nov 27, 12:04
9: Nov 27, 08:26
10: Nov 26, 18:06
11: Nov 26, 12:05
12: Nov 26, 08:29
13: Nov 25, 18:33
14: Nov 25, 11:12
15: Nov 25, 07:08
16: Nov 24, 13:17
17: Nov 23, 18:13
18: Nov 23, 06:17
19: Nov 22, 13:24
20: Nov 22, 09:09
Posts: 157
In response to
"
That one cuts both ways. The number of deaths is undoubtedly much higher. Based on what I've seen, 3% seems pretty reasonable. -- nm
"
by
David
Plus, it's not like we can go around thinking it's 3% for everybody. Predictable racial bias is reportedly emerging WRT how people are being treated -- (link)
Posted by
con_carne
Apr 6 '20, 11:05
(No message)
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/04/02/825730141/the-coronavirus-doesnt-discriminate-but-u-s-health-care-showing-familiar-biases
(www.npr.org)
Responses:
Read the opinion. Garbage. Motivating it is disenfranchisement pure and simple -- nm
-
JackDawson
Apr 6, 21:38
The virus as a biological agent does not but the disparate effect isn’t just in the treatment it’s in who gets it and that was obvious from day zero t
-
JackDawson
Apr 6, 11:08
1
Exactly. Although I sympathize very much with people's desire to have understandable-at-an 8th grade-level data.
-
con_carne
Apr 6, 11:18
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.