Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 10, 18:15
2: Dec 10, 12:28
3: Dec 10, 09:30
4: Dec 10, 05:59
5: Dec 9, 17:07
6: Dec 9, 13:47
7: Dec 9, 10:33
8: Dec 9, 07:33
9: Dec 8, 17:50
10: Dec 8, 10:32
11: Dec 8, 06:23
12: Dec 7, 16:52
13: Dec 7, 07:17
14: Dec 6, 14:40
15: Dec 6, 10:07
16: Dec 6, 07:32
17: Dec 5, 19:48
18: Dec 5, 12:51
19: Dec 5, 10:39
20: Dec 5, 07:07
Posts: 158
In response to
"
In that sense the money is fungible - a worker at one company is as needy as another - but the application should have asked for cash-on-hand numbers. -- nm
"
by
Max
There simply isn't time to process on that basis. Banks were doing no diligence. The idea was to get it out as fast as possible. -- nm
Posted by
pmb (aka pmb)
Apr 21 '20, 09:09
(No message)
Responses:
Applications required excluding employee earnings above $100k. If they could include that in the calc, they could have included current cash.
-
Max
Apr 21, 10:42
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.