ST Alpha - "I think he was saying there were districts that didn’t need a race, but in any case your point fails hard because as we all know Wisconsin needed to h" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "Every House seat is up. 6/23 is the primary for House seats. So there can't be an district without a race." by ty97

I think he was saying there were districts that didn’t need a race, but in any case your point fails hard because as we all know Wisconsin needed to h

Posted by JackDawson (aka dawson) May 5 '20, 18:40

Old primary elections for judges too, on that day

Move them all, or cancel them all, properly addresses the health concern if that’s the true concern

Applauding this decision and decrying Wisconsin’s can’t be squared

Responses:

But WI was moving there's to June when things were ramping up. It's not apples for apples. - ty97 May 5, 18:48 4
- Or move it all to August, or whatever. The same solutions apply. COVID either is or isn’t a concern. If that was the concern in Wisconsin then it’s th - JackDawson May 5, 18:55 3
  - I still disagree. What we knew about COVID a month ago, how we've adapted to it in that time, is different. - ty97 May 5, 19:05 2
    - And FTR, I don't think the March 17 primaries should have moved forward as we were still getting a handle on things. Those should have been delayed -- nm - ty97 May 5, 19:10 1
      - So you decry the judges decision to hold more instead of less primary now, right, since we know more about how deadly COVID is now than we even knew b - JackDawson May 5, 22:37
(Didn’t need and weren’t planning to hold an election) -- nm - JackDawson May 5, 18:40

Post a message top

I think he was saying there were districts that didn’t need a race, but in any case your point fails hard because as we all know Wisconsin needed to h

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.