ST Alpha - ""Sorry, this is a political question, not a legal question. We aren't allowed to settle political questions. Next!" -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "Hilarious in terms of the outrage or hilarious in terms of excuses/justification for blocking? -- nm" by Volnelk

"Sorry, this is a political question, not a legal question. We aren't allowed to settle political questions. Next!" -- nm

Posted by TWuG May 10 '20, 09:41

(No message)

Responses:

My guess is “this is too much a distraction the founders could not have envisioned giving THOSE states rights to the states” -- nm - JackDawson May 10, 10:11 2
- "Clearly the Founders intended the powers of an elected God-King when they... overthrew a King ruling by divine right" -- nm - Reagen May 10, 10:15 1
  - A Republican King. -- nm - VMan May 10, 11:24

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.