ST Alpha - "I'm not saying the numbers of death are, I'm saying that % is to an extent. " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "Yes I get all that. Knowing the true mortality rate and rate of infection are also important - in fact critical - in understanding a disease " by JackDawson

I'm not saying the numbers of death are, I'm saying that % is to an extent.

Posted by Reagen May 10 '20, 10:54

We know it is (BAD NUMBER). This (BAD NUMBER) is much larger than (BAD NUMBER WHERE WE WOULD START MAKING EXTRA EFFORTS), which is the important thing to me. It's a Go/No Go situation, IMO.

Responses:

That’s fine from the perspective of assessing the past responses which are terrible and will be hard to convince me otherwise — But I also want to mov - JackDawson May 10, 11:11
all numbers are significantly off, even deaths, NY death certificates are 5 or 6x last year, people passing out and hitting head/not listed as c19 -- nm - zeitgeist May 10, 11:00 1
- There was significant amounts added to the counts a couple of weeks ago based on "presumed cases" - Reagen May 10, 11:18

Post a message top

I'm not saying the numbers of death are, I'm saying that % is to an extent.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.