ST Alpha - "Well, Jovian's reply to this was prescient -- (link*)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 161

In response to "From the SCOTUS arguments so far: The four liberals will vote consistent with Nixon v. US and Clinton v. Jones that the subpoenas are valid" by JackDawson

Well, Jovian's reply to this was prescient -- (link*)

Posted by znufrii, silly old man (aka znufrii) May 12 '20, 09:18

(No message)

http://slackertalk.com/?post_id=4713489&board_id=30130&username=znufrii (slackertalk.com)

So, violent revolution, then? -- nm

znufrii, human scum (aka znufrii) Nov 1 '19, 13:43

(No message)

In response to dawson: "The other thing that the grant below tells you is that hoping for Elizabeth Warren to save us is a SAD joke. It's over"

Responses:

I'll eat crow soon on this case though, it's not clear why they took the case yet, but it seems like they will uphold some version of this power - JackDawson May 12, 09:21 5
- Yes, the tea readers seem to think Roberts will split the baby somehow. -- nm - Reagen May 12, 09:22 4
  - The Roberts tea leaders are, sorry, complete morons -- nm - JackDawson May 12, 09:24
  - Are you talking about the SEC v. Liu case? Or the subpoenas? In the Liu case, all 8 that spoke seemed to favor the SEC from a little to a lot -- nm - JackDawson May 12, 09:23 2
    - I'm talking about the taxes case. - Reagen May 12, 09:26 1
      - It’s certainly possible. Gorsuch and Roberts are playing both sides, Kavanaugh Thomas and Alito are not -- nm - JackDawson May 12, 09:28

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.